Chile vs Sri Lanka: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Chile
0 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
0 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Sri Lanka rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Chile
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 16th and Sri Lanka ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 9.46 million current US$ | 33.93 million current US$ | 24.47 million current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 7.62 million current US$ | 46.00 million current US$ | 38.38 million current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Chile or Sri Lanka?
- Chile, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Chile and Sri Lanka?
- 0 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Sri Lanka rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Chile ranks 16th and Sri Lanka ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.