Chile vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Chile
0 current US$
in 2020
Mexico
0 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Mexico rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Chile
- Mexico
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mexico, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mexico ahead.
Chile ranks 16th and Mexico ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 9.46 million current US$ | 575.78 million current US$ | 566.32 million current US$ | Mexico |
| 2010s | 7.62 million current US$ | 555.03 million current US$ | 547.41 million current US$ | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Chile or Mexico?
- Chile, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Chile and Mexico?
- 0 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mexico?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Chile ranks 16th and Mexico ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.