Chile vs Malawi: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate

Chile
0 current US$
in 2020
Malawi
722,071 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Malawi rank
14th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time

  • Chile
  • Malawi
020.0M40.0M60.0M199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 722,071 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 722,071 current US$.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 16th and Malawi ranks 14th of 41 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Malawi Difference Ahead
2010s 5.31 million current US$ 9.01 million current US$ 3.71 million current US$ Malawi
2020s 0 current US$ 722,071 current US$ 722,071 current US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Chile or Malawi?
Malawi, at 722,071 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Chile and Malawi?
722,071 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malawi?
9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do Chile and Malawi rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
Chile ranks 16th and Malawi ranks 14th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
41 places, 877 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed