Chile vs Laos: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Chile
0 current US$
in 2020
Laos
0 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Laos rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Chile
- Laos
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Laos, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Laos ahead.
Chile ranks 16th and Laos ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.24 million current US$ | 218.03 million current US$ | 214.79 million current US$ | Laos |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Chile or Laos?
- Chile, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Laos as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Chile and Laos?
- 0 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Laos?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Laos rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Chile ranks 16th and Laos ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.