Chile vs Jordan: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Chile
0 current US$
in 2020
Jordan
0 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Jordan rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Chile
- Jordan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Jordan, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 16th and Jordan ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 9.46 million current US$ | 4.73 billion current US$ | 4.72 billion current US$ | Jordan |
| 2010s | 7.62 million current US$ | 6.58 billion current US$ | 6.57 billion current US$ | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Chile or Jordan?
- Chile, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Jordan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Chile and Jordan?
- 0 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jordan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Jordan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Chile ranks 16th and Jordan ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.