Canada vs Finland: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Canada
325.08 million current US$
in 2013
Finland
448.31 million current US$
in 2020
Canada rank
4th
Finland rank
3rd
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Canada
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 448.31 million current US$ against 325.08 million current US$ in Canada, a difference of 123.23 million current US$.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.4 times Canada's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 4th and Finland ranks 3rd of 41 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 259.28 million current US$ | 715.54 million current US$ | 456.26 million current US$ | Finland |
| 2010s | 199.01 million current US$ | 2.01 billion current US$ | 1.82 billion current US$ | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Canada or Finland?
- Finland, at 448.31 million current US$ against 325.08 million current US$ in Canada as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Canada and Finland?
- 123.23 million current US$, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Finland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Canada and Finland rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Canada ranks 4th and Finland ranks 3rd of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.