Burkina Faso vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Burkina Faso
0 current US$
in 2020
Peru
0 current US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso rank
16th
Peru rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Burkina Faso
- Peru
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Peru ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 16th and Peru ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.15 million current US$ | 19.04 million current US$ | 17.89 million current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 1.76 million current US$ | 1.81 billion current US$ | 1.81 billion current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Burkina Faso or Peru?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Burkina Faso and Peru?
- 0 current US$, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Peru?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Burkina Faso and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Burkina Faso ranks 16th and Peru ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.