Brazil vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Brazil
0 current US$
in 2020
Philippines
0 current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
16th
Philippines rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Brazil
- Philippines
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Philippines ahead.
Brazil ranks 16th and Philippines ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 4.01 billion current US$ | 1.71 million current US$ | 4.01 billion current US$ | Brazil |
| 2010s | 3.47 billion current US$ | 2.34 million current US$ | 3.47 billion current US$ | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Brazil or Philippines?
- Brazil, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Brazil and Philippines?
- 0 current US$, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Philippines?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Philippines rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Brazil ranks 16th and Philippines ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.