Australia vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Mexico
0 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
16th
Mexico rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Australia
- Mexico
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mexico, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mexico ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Mexico ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 1.24 billion current US$ | 575.78 million current US$ | 662.62 million current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 1.12 billion current US$ | 555.03 million current US$ | 563.20 million current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Australia or Mexico?
- Australia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Australia and Mexico?
- 0 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mexico?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Australia ranks 16th and Mexico ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.