Australia vs Malawi: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Malawi
722,071 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
16th
Malawi rank
14th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Australia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 722,071 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 722,071 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Malawi ranks 14th of 41 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 695.40 million current US$ | 9.01 million current US$ | 686.39 million current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 722,071 current US$ | 722,071 current US$ | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Australia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 722,071 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Australia and Malawi?
- 722,071 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malawi?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Malawi rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Australia ranks 16th and Malawi ranks 14th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.