Australia vs Germany: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Germany
0 current US$
in 2004
Australia rank
16th
Germany rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Australia
- Germany
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Germany, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 16th and Germany ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Australia or Germany?
- Australia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Germany as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Australia and Germany?
- 0 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Germany?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2004.
- How do Australia and Germany rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Australia ranks 16th and Germany ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.