Australia vs Burkina Faso: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso
0 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
16th
Burkina Faso rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Australia
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Burkina Faso ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.38 billion current US$ | 1.89 million current US$ | 1.37 billion current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 1.12 billion current US$ | 1.76 million current US$ | 1.12 billion current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Australia or Burkina Faso?
- Australia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Burkina Faso as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Australia and Burkina Faso?
- 0 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Burkina Faso?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Burkina Faso rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Australia ranks 16th and Burkina Faso ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.