Australia vs Brazil: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Brazil
0 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
16th
Brazil rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Australia
- Brazil
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 16th and Brazil ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 1.24 billion current US$ | 4.01 billion current US$ | 2.77 billion current US$ | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.12 billion current US$ | 3.47 billion current US$ | 2.35 billion current US$ | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Australia or Brazil?
- Australia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Australia and Brazil?
- 0 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Brazil?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Brazil rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Australia ranks 16th and Brazil ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.