Finland vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel

Finland
452.52 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
1.27 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Finland rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
14th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel over time

  • Finland
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.27 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 452.52 million real chained 2019 US$ in Finland, a difference of 815.01 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.8 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Finland ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 14th of 144 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 351.03 million real chained 2019 US$ 659.80 million real chained 2019 US$ 308.76 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 558.57 million real chained 2019 US$ 284.26 million real chained 2019 US$ 274.31 million real chained 2019 US$ Finland
2010s 504.17 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.04 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 452.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.27 billion real chained 2019 US$ 815.01 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel, Finland or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.27 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 452.52 million real chained 2019 US$ in Finland as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel between Finland and Zimbabwe?
815.01 million real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Finland and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel?
Finland ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 14th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-nickel-real-chained-2019-us/finland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-nickel-real-chained-2019-us/finland/zimbabwe/">Finland vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,703 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed