Australia vs Brazil: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel

Australia
19.30 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Brazil
10.89 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
3rd
Brazil rank
5th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel over time

  • Australia
  • Brazil
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B25.0B199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 19.30 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 10.89 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil, a difference of 8.42 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.8 times Brazil's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 3rd and Brazil ranks 5th of 144 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Brazil Difference Ahead
1990s 5.73 billion real chained 2019 US$ 455.84 million real chained 2019 US$ 5.28 billion real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2000s 22.59 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.83 billion real chained 2019 US$ 19.76 billion real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2010s 18.79 billion real chained 2019 US$ 6.77 billion real chained 2019 US$ 12.01 billion real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2020s 19.30 billion real chained 2019 US$ 10.89 billion real chained 2019 US$ 8.42 billion real chained 2019 US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel, Australia or Brazil?
Australia, at 19.30 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 10.89 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel between Australia and Brazil?
8.42 billion real chained 2019 US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Brazil?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Brazil rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel?
Australia ranks 3rd and Brazil ranks 5th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Brazil: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-nickel-real-chained-2019-us/australia/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-nickel-real-chained-2019-us/australia/brazil/">Australia vs Brazil: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,703 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed