Colombia vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel

Colombia
4.20 billion current US$
in 2020
South Africa
4.86 billion current US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
9th
South Africa rank
8th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel over time

  • Colombia
  • South Africa
010.0B20.0B30.0B199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 4.86 billion current US$ against 4.20 billion current US$ in Colombia, a difference of 662.04 million current US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Colombia ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 8th of 26 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 877.10 million current US$ 2.43 billion current US$ 1.56 billion current US$ South Africa
2000s 7.75 billion current US$ 8.24 billion current US$ 490.90 million current US$ South Africa
2010s 2.87 billion current US$ 6.56 billion current US$ 3.69 billion current US$ South Africa
2020s 4.20 billion current US$ 4.86 billion current US$ 662.04 million current US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel, Colombia or South Africa?
South Africa, at 4.86 billion current US$ against 4.20 billion current US$ in Colombia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel between Colombia and South Africa?
662.04 million current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Colombia and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel?
Colombia ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 8th of 26 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-nickel-current-us/colombia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-nickel-current-us/colombia/south-africa/">Colombia vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 530 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed