Australia vs Guatemala: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel
Australia
12.81 billion current US$
in 2020
Guatemala
5.77 billion current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
5th
Guatemala rank
6th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel over time
- Australia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Australia currently reports 12.81 billion current US$ against 5.77 billion current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 7.04 billion current US$.
That makes Australia's figure about 2.2 times Guatemala's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 5th and Guatemala ranks 6th of 26 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.13 billion current US$ | 1.02 billion current US$ | 18.11 billion current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 12.81 billion current US$ | 5.77 billion current US$ | 7.04 billion current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel, Australia or Guatemala?
- Australia, at 12.81 billion current US$ against 5.77 billion current US$ in Guatemala as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel between Australia and Guatemala?
- 7.04 billion current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guatemala?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Guatemala rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel?
- Australia ranks 5th and Guatemala ranks 6th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: nickel (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.