Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lithium

Brazil
174.45 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
128.96 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
5th
Zimbabwe rank
6th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lithium over time

  • Brazil
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 174.45 million real chained 2019 US$ against 128.96 million real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 45.48 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Brazil ranks 5th and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 146 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1.67 million real chained 2019 US$ 13.48 million real chained 2019 US$ 11.81 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 291.04 million real chained 2019 US$ 13.48 million real chained 2019 US$ 277.55 million real chained 2019 US$ Brazil
2010s 108.71 million real chained 2019 US$ 40.51 million real chained 2019 US$ 68.20 million real chained 2019 US$ Brazil
2020s 174.45 million real chained 2019 US$ 128.96 million real chained 2019 US$ 45.48 million real chained 2019 US$ Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lithium, Brazil or Zimbabwe?
Brazil, at 174.45 million real chained 2019 US$ against 128.96 million real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lithium between Brazil and Zimbabwe?
45.48 million real chained 2019 US$, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lithium?
Brazil ranks 5th and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lithium (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lithium. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lithium-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lithium-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/zimbabwe/">Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lithium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lithium (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
146 places, 3,755 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed