South Africa vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead

South Africa
583.22 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sweden
796.23 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa rank
11th
Sweden rank
10th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • South Africa
  • Sweden
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199520072020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 796.23 million real chained 2019 US$ against 583.22 million real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa, a difference of 213.01 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.4 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 10th of 140 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 1.47 billion real chained 2019 US$ 386.14 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 514.51 million real chained 2019 US$ 540.60 million real chained 2019 US$ 26.10 million real chained 2019 US$ Sweden
2010s 335.13 million real chained 2019 US$ 838.47 million real chained 2019 US$ 503.35 million real chained 2019 US$ Sweden
2020s 583.22 million real chained 2019 US$ 796.23 million real chained 2019 US$ 213.01 million real chained 2019 US$ Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, South Africa or Sweden?
Sweden, at 796.23 million real chained 2019 US$ against 583.22 million real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between South Africa and Sweden?
213.01 million real chained 2019 US$, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do South Africa and Sweden rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
South Africa ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 10th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/south-africa/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/south-africa/sweden/">South Africa vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 3,599 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed