Brazil vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead

Brazil
25.94 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
48.50 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
33rd
Serbia rank
30th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Brazil
  • Serbia
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 48.50 million real chained 2019 US$ against 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil, a difference of 22.56 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.9 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 33rd and Serbia ranks 30th of 140 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 61.66 million real chained 2019 US$ 59.06 million real chained 2019 US$ 2.60 million real chained 2019 US$ Brazil
2010s 36.65 million real chained 2019 US$ 53.47 million real chained 2019 US$ 16.82 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ 48.50 million real chained 2019 US$ 22.56 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, Brazil or Serbia?
Serbia, at 48.50 million real chained 2019 US$ against 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between Brazil and Serbia?
22.56 million real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
Brazil ranks 33rd and Serbia ranks 30th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/serbia/">Brazil vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 3,599 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed