Brazil vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead

Brazil
25.94 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
36.00 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
33rd
Namibia rank
31st

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Brazil
  • Namibia
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M120.0M199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 36.00 million real chained 2019 US$ against 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil, a difference of 10.05 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Brazil ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 31st of 140 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 95.80 million real chained 2019 US$ 106.35 million real chained 2019 US$ 10.55 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 75.59 million real chained 2019 US$ 78.76 million real chained 2019 US$ 3.17 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 36.65 million real chained 2019 US$ 47.04 million real chained 2019 US$ 10.39 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ 36.00 million real chained 2019 US$ 10.05 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, Brazil or Namibia?
Namibia, at 36.00 million real chained 2019 US$ against 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between Brazil and Namibia?
10.05 million real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
Brazil ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 31st of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/namibia/">Brazil vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 3,599 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed