Brazil vs South Korea: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead

Brazil
25.94 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Korea
18.72 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
33rd
South Korea rank
35th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Brazil
  • South Korea
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199520072020

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ against 18.72 million real chained 2019 US$ in South Korea, a difference of 7.22 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.4 times South Korea's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 33rd and South Korea ranks 35th of 140 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil South Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 95.80 million real chained 2019 US$ 36.24 million real chained 2019 US$ 59.56 million real chained 2019 US$ Brazil
2000s 75.59 million real chained 2019 US$ 29.39 million real chained 2019 US$ 46.20 million real chained 2019 US$ Brazil
2010s 36.65 million real chained 2019 US$ 24.05 million real chained 2019 US$ 12.60 million real chained 2019 US$ Brazil
2020s 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ 18.72 million real chained 2019 US$ 7.22 million real chained 2019 US$ Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, Brazil or South Korea?
Brazil, at 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ against 18.72 million real chained 2019 US$ in South Korea as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between Brazil and South Korea?
7.22 million real chained 2019 US$, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Korea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and South Korea rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
Brazil ranks 33rd and South Korea ranks 35th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs South Korea: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/korea-rep/">Brazil vs South Korea: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 3,599 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed