Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead

Bosnia and Herzegovina
56.16 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
48.50 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
29th
Serbia rank
30th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Serbia
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 56.16 million real chained 2019 US$ against 48.50 million real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 7.66 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 29th and Serbia ranks 30th of 140 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 79.68 million real chained 2019 US$ 59.06 million real chained 2019 US$ 20.62 million real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 67.94 million real chained 2019 US$ 53.47 million real chained 2019 US$ 14.46 million real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 56.16 million real chained 2019 US$ 48.50 million real chained 2019 US$ 7.66 million real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Serbia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 56.16 million real chained 2019 US$ against 48.50 million real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
7.66 million real chained 2019 US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 29th and Serbia ranks 30th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/serbia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 3,599 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed