Serbia vs Spain: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead
Serbia
34.24 million current US$
in 2020
Spain
41.91 million current US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
31st
Spain rank
30th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Serbia
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 41.91 million current US$ against 34.24 million current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 7.67 million current US$.
That makes Spain's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 31st and Spain ranks 30th of 51 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.14 million current US$ | 19.27 million current US$ | 13.87 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 45.08 million current US$ | 80.42 million current US$ | 35.34 million current US$ | Spain |
| 2020s | 34.24 million current US$ | 41.91 million current US$ | 7.67 million current US$ | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, Serbia or Spain?
- Spain, at 41.91 million current US$ against 34.24 million current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between Serbia and Spain?
- 7.67 million current US$, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Spain?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Serbia and Spain rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
- Serbia ranks 31st and Spain ranks 30th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.