Namibia vs Pakistan: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead
Namibia
48.91 million current US$
in 2020
Pakistan
60.45 million current US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
29th
Pakistan rank
26th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Namibia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 60.45 million current US$ against 48.91 million current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 11.54 million current US$.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 26th of 51 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 103.26 million current US$ | 56.04 million current US$ | 47.22 million current US$ | Namibia |
| 2020s | 48.91 million current US$ | 60.45 million current US$ | 11.54 million current US$ | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, Namibia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 60.45 million current US$ against 48.91 million current US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between Namibia and Pakistan?
- 11.54 million current US$, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Pakistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Namibia and Pakistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
- Namibia ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 26th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.