Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead

Bosnia and Herzegovina
32.97 million current US$
in 2020
Serbia
34.24 million current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
32nd
Serbia rank
31st

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Serbia
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M199720082020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 34.24 million current US$ against 32.97 million current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.27 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 31st of 51 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 76.78 million current US$ 46.17 million current US$ 30.61 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 71.09 million current US$ 45.08 million current US$ 26.01 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 32.97 million current US$ 34.24 million current US$ 1.27 million current US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Serbia?
Serbia, at 34.24 million current US$ against 32.97 million current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
1.27 million current US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 31st of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/serbia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 1,007 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed