Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead

Bosnia and Herzegovina
32.97 million current US$
in 2020
Namibia
48.91 million current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
32nd
Namibia rank
29th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Namibia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 48.91 million current US$ against 32.97 million current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 15.93 million current US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.5 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Namibia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 32nd and Namibia ranks 29th of 51 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.09 million current US$ 70.42 million current US$ 69.33 million current US$ Namibia
2000s 27.27 million current US$ 117.67 million current US$ 90.40 million current US$ Namibia
2010s 69.82 million current US$ 103.26 million current US$ 33.45 million current US$ Namibia
2020s 32.97 million current US$ 48.91 million current US$ 15.93 million current US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Namibia?
Namibia, at 48.91 million current US$ against 32.97 million current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
15.93 million current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
24 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 32nd and Namibia ranks 29th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/namibia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 1,007 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed