Australia vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead

Australia
4.30 billion current US$
in 2020
Russian Federation
4.40 billion current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
3rd
Russian Federation rank
2nd

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Australia
  • Russian Federation
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B199520072020

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 4.40 billion current US$ against 4.30 billion current US$ in Australia, a difference of 98.69 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 2nd of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 3.69 billion current US$ 104.94 million current US$ 3.58 billion current US$ Australia
2000s 8.12 billion current US$ 562.99 million current US$ 7.56 billion current US$ Australia
2010s 10.55 billion current US$ 2.79 billion current US$ 7.75 billion current US$ Australia
2020s 4.30 billion current US$ 4.40 billion current US$ 98.69 million current US$ Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, Australia or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 4.40 billion current US$ against 4.30 billion current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between Australia and Russian Federation?
98.69 million current US$, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Russian Federation rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
Australia ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 2nd of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/australia/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/australia/russian-federation/">Australia vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 1,007 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed