Australia vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead

Australia
4.30 billion current US$
in 2020
Mexico
1.89 billion current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
3rd
Mexico rank
6th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Australia
  • Mexico
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 4.30 billion current US$ against 1.89 billion current US$ in Mexico, a difference of 2.41 billion current US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 2.3 times Mexico's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 3rd and Mexico ranks 6th of 51 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Mexico Difference Ahead
1990s 3.69 billion current US$ 295.56 million current US$ 3.39 billion current US$ Australia
2000s 8.12 billion current US$ 1.07 billion current US$ 7.05 billion current US$ Australia
2010s 10.55 billion current US$ 2.65 billion current US$ 7.90 billion current US$ Australia
2020s 4.30 billion current US$ 1.89 billion current US$ 2.41 billion current US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead, Australia or Mexico?
Australia, at 4.30 billion current US$ against 1.89 billion current US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead between Australia and Mexico?
2.41 billion current US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mexico?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead?
Australia ranks 3rd and Mexico ranks 6th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/australia/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/australia/mexico/">Australia vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: lead (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 1,007 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed