Namibia vs Uruguay: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore

Namibia
15.09 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Uruguay
5.21 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
36th
Uruguay rank
37th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore over time

  • Namibia
  • Uruguay
5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M15.0M199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 15.09 million real chained 2019 US$ against 5.21 million real chained 2019 US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 9.88 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 2.9 times Uruguay's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 36th and Uruguay ranks 37th of 129 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 15.28 million real chained 2019 US$ 7.24 million real chained 2019 US$ 8.04 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 15.28 million real chained 2019 US$ 7.24 million real chained 2019 US$ 8.04 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 15.26 million real chained 2019 US$ 6.39 million real chained 2019 US$ 8.87 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 15.09 million real chained 2019 US$ 5.21 million real chained 2019 US$ 9.88 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore, Namibia or Uruguay?
Namibia, at 15.09 million real chained 2019 US$ against 5.21 million real chained 2019 US$ in Uruguay as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore between Namibia and Uruguay?
9.88 million real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uruguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Uruguay rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore?
Namibia ranks 36th and Uruguay ranks 37th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Uruguay: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/uruguay/">Namibia vs Uruguay: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
129 places, 3,313 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed