Romania vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore
Romania
15.55 million current US$
in 2007
Zimbabwe
8.56 million current US$
in 2008
Romania rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
48th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore over time
- Romania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Romania currently reports 15.55 million current US$ against 8.56 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6.99 million current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.8 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34.25 million current US$ | 4.17 million current US$ | 30.08 million current US$ | Romania |
| 2000s | 15.01 million current US$ | 15.47 million current US$ | 454,721 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore, Romania or Zimbabwe?
- Romania, at 15.55 million current US$ against 8.56 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2007.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore between Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 6.99 million current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2007.
- How do Romania and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore?
- Romania ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.