Portugal vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore
Portugal
15.49 million current US$
in 2014
Zimbabwe
8.56 million current US$
in 2008
Portugal rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
48th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore over time
- Portugal
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 15.49 million current US$ against 8.56 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6.93 million current US$.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.8 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Portugal ahead.
Portugal ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 57 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.96 million current US$ | 4.17 million current US$ | 1.21 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 11.59 million current US$ | 14.70 million current US$ | 3.11 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore, Portugal or Zimbabwe?
- Portugal, at 15.49 million current US$ against 8.56 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore between Portugal and Zimbabwe?
- 6.93 million current US$, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2008.
- How do Portugal and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore?
- Portugal ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.