Philippines vs Togo: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore
Philippines
67.12 million current US$
in 2020
Togo
70.12 million current US$
in 2020
Philippines rank
42nd
Togo rank
41st
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore over time
- Philippines
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 70.12 million current US$ against 67.12 million current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 3.00 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 42nd and Togo ranks 41st of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 158.51 million current US$ | 78.55 million current US$ | 79.96 million current US$ | Philippines |
| 2020s | 67.12 million current US$ | 70.12 million current US$ | 3.00 million current US$ | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore, Philippines or Togo?
- Togo, at 70.12 million current US$ against 67.12 million current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore between Philippines and Togo?
- 3.00 million current US$, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Togo?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and Togo rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore?
- Philippines ranks 42nd and Togo ranks 41st of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.