Malawi vs Uruguay: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore
Malawi
4.06 million current US$
in 2020
Uruguay
4.29 million current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
51st
Uruguay rank
50th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore over time
- Malawi
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 4.29 million current US$ against 4.06 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 225,630 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 51st and Uruguay ranks 50th of 57 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.03 million current US$ | 2.04 million current US$ | 13,889 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 4.06 million current US$ | 4.29 million current US$ | 225,630 current US$ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore, Malawi or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 4.29 million current US$ against 4.06 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore between Malawi and Uruguay?
- 225,630 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Uruguay rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore?
- Malawi ranks 51st and Uruguay ranks 50th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: iron ore (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.