Georgia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold

Georgia
2.17 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
2.84 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
49th
Namibia rank
47th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold over time

  • Georgia
  • Namibia
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 2.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.17 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Georgia, a difference of 672.68 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Georgia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 49th and Namibia ranks 47th of 142 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 3.44 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.10 billion real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 3.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.14 billion real chained 2019 US$ 949.90 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 2.56 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.51 billion real chained 2019 US$ 947.76 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 2.17 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ 672.68 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold, Georgia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 2.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.17 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold between Georgia and Namibia?
672.68 million real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold?
Georgia ranks 49th and Namibia ranks 47th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/namibia/">Georgia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,663 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed