Ecuador vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold

Ecuador
3.19 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
2.84 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
44th
Namibia rank
47th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold over time

  • Ecuador
  • Namibia
02.0B4.0B6.0B199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 343.94 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 47th of 142 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 5.46 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ 922.34 million real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2000s 4.81 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.14 billion real chained 2019 US$ 674.54 million real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 3.86 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.51 billion real chained 2019 US$ 345.57 million real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 3.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ 343.94 million real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold, Ecuador or Namibia?
Ecuador, at 3.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold between Ecuador and Namibia?
343.94 million real chained 2019 US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold?
Ecuador ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 47th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold. Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/namibia/">Ecuador vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,663 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed