Nigeria vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold
Nigeria
23.02 million current US$
in 2020
Serbia
54.05 million current US$
in 2016
Nigeria rank
87th
Serbia rank
86th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Nigeria
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 54.05 million current US$ against 23.02 million current US$ in Nigeria, a difference of 31.03 million current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 2.3 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Nigeria ranks 87th and Serbia ranks 86th of 96 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.15 million current US$ | 119.45 million current US$ | 66.31 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 68.81 million current US$ | 134.42 million current US$ | 65.61 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold, Nigeria or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 54.05 million current US$ against 23.02 million current US$ in Nigeria as of 2016.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold between Nigeria and Serbia?
- 31.03 million current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Nigeria and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold?
- Nigeria ranks 87th and Serbia ranks 86th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.