Morocco vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold
Morocco
88.75 million current US$
in 2020
Serbia
54.05 million current US$
in 2016
Morocco rank
83rd
Serbia rank
86th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Morocco
- Serbia
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 88.75 million current US$ against 54.05 million current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 34.71 million current US$.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.6 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Morocco ahead.
Morocco ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 86th of 96 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.72 million current US$ | 119.45 million current US$ | 20.74 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 47.29 million current US$ | 134.42 million current US$ | 87.13 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold, Morocco or Serbia?
- Morocco, at 88.75 million current US$ against 54.05 million current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold between Morocco and Serbia?
- 34.71 million current US$, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Morocco and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold?
- Morocco ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 86th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.