Madagascar vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold
Madagascar
19.05 million current US$
in 2012
Serbia
54.05 million current US$
in 2016
Madagascar rank
89th
Serbia rank
86th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Madagascar
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 54.05 million current US$ against 19.05 million current US$ in Madagascar, a difference of 35.00 million current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 2.8 times Madagascar's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 89th and Serbia ranks 86th of 96 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.63 million current US$ | 119.45 million current US$ | 115.83 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 10.70 million current US$ | 185.21 million current US$ | 174.51 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold, Madagascar or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 54.05 million current US$ against 19.05 million current US$ in Madagascar as of 2016.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold between Madagascar and Serbia?
- 35.00 million current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2012.
- How do Madagascar and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold?
- Madagascar ranks 89th and Serbia ranks 86th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.