Serbia vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper

Serbia
2.23 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
2.32 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
26th
South Africa rank
25th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Serbia
  • South Africa
02.0B4.0B6.0B199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 2.32 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.23 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 92.02 million real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 14 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 25th of 145 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 2.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.71 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.16 billion real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2010s 2.40 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.85 billion real chained 2019 US$ 451.35 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2020s 2.23 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.32 billion real chained 2019 US$ 92.02 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper, Serbia or South Africa?
South Africa, at 2.32 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.23 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper between Serbia and South Africa?
92.02 million real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and South Africa?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Serbia and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper?
Serbia ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 25th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/south-africa/">Serbia vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed