Namibia vs Romania: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper

Namibia
456.00 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Romania
436.48 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
36th
Romania rank
37th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Namibia
  • Romania
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ against 436.48 million real chained 2019 US$ in Romania, a difference of 19.52 million real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Romania ahead.

Namibia ranks 36th and Romania ranks 37th of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 570.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 689.16 million real chained 2019 US$ 119.04 million real chained 2019 US$ Romania
2000s 528.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 558.25 million real chained 2019 US$ 29.73 million real chained 2019 US$ Romania
2010s 491.27 million real chained 2019 US$ 478.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 12.75 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ 436.48 million real chained 2019 US$ 19.52 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper, Namibia or Romania?
Namibia, at 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ against 436.48 million real chained 2019 US$ in Romania as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper between Namibia and Romania?
19.52 million real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Romania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Romania rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper?
Namibia ranks 36th and Romania ranks 37th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Romania: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/romania/">Namibia vs Romania: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed