Namibia vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper

Namibia
456.00 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Philippines
427.01 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
36th
Philippines rank
39th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Namibia
  • Philippines
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ against 427.01 million real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines, a difference of 28.99 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Philippines ahead.

Namibia ranks 36th and Philippines ranks 39th of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 570.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 625.69 million real chained 2019 US$ 55.57 million real chained 2019 US$ Philippines
2000s 528.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 538.78 million real chained 2019 US$ 10.26 million real chained 2019 US$ Philippines
2010s 491.27 million real chained 2019 US$ 479.90 million real chained 2019 US$ 11.38 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ 427.01 million real chained 2019 US$ 28.99 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper, Namibia or Philippines?
Namibia, at 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ against 427.01 million real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper between Namibia and Philippines?
28.99 million real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Philippines?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Philippines rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper?
Namibia ranks 36th and Philippines ranks 39th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/philippines/">Namibia vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed