Namibia vs Pakistan: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper

Namibia
456.00 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Pakistan
560.91 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
36th
Pakistan rank
34th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Namibia
  • Pakistan
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M199520072020

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 560.91 million real chained 2019 US$ against 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 104.91 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 36th and Pakistan ranks 34th of 145 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 570.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 761.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 190.99 million real chained 2019 US$ Pakistan
2000s 528.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 737.32 million real chained 2019 US$ 208.80 million real chained 2019 US$ Pakistan
2010s 491.27 million real chained 2019 US$ 617.15 million real chained 2019 US$ 125.88 million real chained 2019 US$ Pakistan
2020s 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ 560.91 million real chained 2019 US$ 104.91 million real chained 2019 US$ Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper, Namibia or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 560.91 million real chained 2019 US$ against 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper between Namibia and Pakistan?
104.91 million real chained 2019 US$, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Pakistan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Pakistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper?
Namibia ranks 36th and Pakistan ranks 34th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Pakistan: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/pakistan/">Namibia vs Pakistan: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed