Georgia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper

Georgia
473.80 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
456.00 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
35th
Namibia rank
36th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Georgia
  • Namibia
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 473.80 million real chained 2019 US$ against 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 17.80 million real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 35th and Namibia ranks 36th of 145 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 637.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 570.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 67.00 million real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2000s 584.57 million real chained 2019 US$ 528.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 56.05 million real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2010s 510.83 million real chained 2019 US$ 491.27 million real chained 2019 US$ 19.56 million real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2020s 473.80 million real chained 2019 US$ 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ 17.80 million real chained 2019 US$ Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper, Georgia or Namibia?
Georgia, at 473.80 million real chained 2019 US$ against 456.00 million real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper between Georgia and Namibia?
17.80 million real chained 2019 US$, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper?
Georgia ranks 35th and Namibia ranks 36th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/namibia/">Georgia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed