Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper

Colombia
301.80 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
269.47 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
43rd
Zimbabwe rank
45th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Colombia
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199520072020

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 301.80 million real chained 2019 US$ against 269.47 million real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 32.33 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Colombia ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 342.39 million real chained 2019 US$ 345.02 million real chained 2019 US$ 2.63 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 334.23 million real chained 2019 US$ 325.97 million real chained 2019 US$ 8.26 million real chained 2019 US$ Colombia
2010s 322.73 million real chained 2019 US$ 297.61 million real chained 2019 US$ 25.12 million real chained 2019 US$ Colombia
2020s 301.80 million real chained 2019 US$ 269.47 million real chained 2019 US$ 32.33 million real chained 2019 US$ Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
Colombia, at 301.80 million real chained 2019 US$ against 269.47 million real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
32.33 million real chained 2019 US$, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper?
Colombia ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/zimbabwe/">Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed