China vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper

China
44.08 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
26.84 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China rank
6th
Zambia rank
9th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • China
  • Zambia
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B199520072020

How they compare

China currently reports 44.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 26.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 17.24 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes China's figure about 1.6 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.

China ranks 6th and Zambia ranks 9th of 145 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 25.43 billion real chained 2019 US$ 15.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ 10.09 billion real chained 2019 US$ China
2000s 44.76 billion real chained 2019 US$ 23.52 billion real chained 2019 US$ 21.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ China
2010s 47.58 billion real chained 2019 US$ 25.36 billion real chained 2019 US$ 22.22 billion real chained 2019 US$ China
2020s 44.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ 26.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ 17.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper, China or Zambia?
China, at 44.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 26.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper between China and Zambia?
17.24 billion real chained 2019 US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do China and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper?
China ranks 6th and Zambia ranks 9th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/china/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/china/zambia/">China vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed