Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper

Tanzania
414.81 million current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
451.79 million current US$
in 2020
Tanzania rank
44th
Zimbabwe rank
42nd

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Tanzania
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 451.79 million current US$ against 414.81 million current US$ in Tanzania, a difference of 36.98 million current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Tanzania ahead.

Tanzania ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 55 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Tanzania averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 117.12 million current US$ 124.41 million current US$ 7.30 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 477.07 million current US$ 289.39 million current US$ 187.67 million current US$ Tanzania
2020s 414.81 million current US$ 451.79 million current US$ 36.98 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper, Tanzania or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 451.79 million current US$ against 414.81 million current US$ in Tanzania as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper between Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
36.98 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
How do Tanzania and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper?
Tanzania ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,195 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed