Ecuador vs Malaysia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper

Ecuador
6.80 million current US$
in 2004
Malaysia
11.55 million current US$
in 2009
Ecuador rank
55th
Malaysia rank
54th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malaysia
050.0M100.0M150.0M199520022009

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 11.55 million current US$ against 6.80 million current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 4.75 million current US$.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.7 times Ecuador's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 55th and Malaysia ranks 54th of 55 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper, Ecuador or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 11.55 million current US$ against 6.80 million current US$ in Ecuador as of 2009.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper between Ecuador and Malaysia?
4.75 million current US$, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
5 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 1999.
How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper?
Ecuador ranks 55th and Malaysia ranks 54th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,195 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed