Bolivia vs Malaysia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper
Bolivia
144.93 million current US$
in 2020
Malaysia
11.55 million current US$
in 2009
Bolivia rank
51st
Malaysia rank
54th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper over time
- Bolivia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 144.93 million current US$ against 11.55 million current US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 133.38 million current US$.
That makes Bolivia's figure about 12.5 times Malaysia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 51st and Malaysia ranks 54th of 55 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.59 million current US$ | 51.23 million current US$ | 47.65 million current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 11.55 million current US$ | 11.55 million current US$ | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper, Bolivia or Malaysia?
- Bolivia, at 144.93 million current US$ against 11.55 million current US$ in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper between Bolivia and Malaysia?
- 133.38 million current US$, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2009.
- How do Bolivia and Malaysia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper?
- Bolivia ranks 51st and Malaysia ranks 54th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.