Mexico vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: bauxite
Mexico
15.14 million current US$
in 2012
Suriname
37.74 million current US$
in 2015
Mexico rank
23rd
Suriname rank
21st
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: bauxite over time
- Mexico
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 37.74 million current US$ against 15.14 million current US$ in Mexico, a difference of 22.60 million current US$.
That makes Suriname's figure about 2.5 times Mexico's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 23rd and Suriname ranks 21st of 32 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.40 million current US$ | 1.04 billion current US$ | 1.03 billion current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 7.46 million current US$ | 605.43 million current US$ | 597.98 million current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: bauxite, Mexico or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 37.74 million current US$ against 15.14 million current US$ in Mexico as of 2015.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: bauxite between Mexico and Suriname?
- 22.60 million current US$, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2012.
- How do Mexico and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: bauxite?
- Mexico ranks 23rd and Suriname ranks 21st of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.